"When the African begins to deliberately and as much as possible produce what she consumes and consume that which she produces, only then can we begin to see the rise, the re-industrialisation, the development and creation of value for the continent”
The idea of recapturing certain imports into the country seeks to reduce competition from cheaper imports so that local industry can occupy that space and reduce the import bill. It is a fact that each time we import as a country we are effectively creating jobs elsewhere and therefore working against ourselves. Many countries protect their economies from competition so that they are able to maintain and develop their industrial base, protect local jobs and encourage local investment in those specific sectors.
Countries which became rich by creating higher incomes and high investment returns for investors at some stage protected and nurtured their manufacturing sectors. An example is the West which deliberately banned the manufacture of specific goods within colonies, thereby allowing them to add value locally to raw materials imported from the colonies and retain that value within their economies.
Rwanda through its "Made in Rwanda” policy has clearly articulated its intentions of reducing imports in order to deal with the trade deficit and adding value and beneficiating its raw materials especially in agriculture and mining sectors. This will allow the creation of high value local jobs and retention of value within the local industry and economy.
On the other hand, while it is critical that local industry is protected from cheap imports, it is important that local consumers are not the losers. The protection of local industry from imports can also lead to price monopoly and reduced competition especially where there are a few players producing specific goods or services.
It is also critical that consumers in general deliberately buy locally produced goods and understand the positive economic impact of doing so.
In cases where local industry does not have or has not developed adequate capacity to meet local demand, this can lead to shortages and price hikes to the detriment of the consumer. The lack of foreign exchange to import essential input raw materials can also result in local industries being unable to meet local demand and that has been the case. This means that even if they may have the capacity, they are unable to fully utilise that capacity to meet market demand.
What is the best way forward?
It is critical to plan effectively. The best route, in my opinion, is to aggressively invest in and develop the manufacturing sector to replace imports over the medium to long term. When we commit to developing local industry it is important that they have access to adequate capital and the requisite skills and technologies over an agreed period. It is also key that we ensure that there is adequate competition within these sectors so that we do not inadvertently create monopolies.
Some very thought provoking insightful research has been done on how to industrialise and I want to point out to my readers the work done by Professor Erik Reinert in his book "How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor.” Central to his insights, is that countries who wish to industrialise must endeavour to emulate industrialised countries and rather look and understand at what they actually did to industrialise as opposed to what they may prescribe to other countries who wish take the same path. Professor Reinert studied 500 years of economic developmental policies in what are now industrialised countries and what is indeed striking, is that the now industrialised countries took a route which they now actively discourage developing countries to take.
In his book Reinert suggests what he terms "the toolbox for economic emulation and development” for those countries who wish to implement sustainable developmental policies through industrialisation. His advice is informed by the policies which the now industrialised countries actually implemented.