Diplomacy, not dominance: Qatar’s breakthrough in the DR Congo

In the heart of Africa, where tragedy and hope often collide, the conflict in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo) has long stood as a testament to the failure of international diplomacy. The crisis—marked by incessant violence, displacements, and an ever-shifting landscape of alliances—has been a litmus test for global conflict resolution efforts. For decades, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), the European Union (EU), and Western powers have pontificated about peace while their actions—more often than not—have been dictated by self-interest rather than a genuine desire to resolve the crisis. Yet, in a striking turn of events, Qatar—a small Gulf nation with no seat at the UNSC, no colonial history in Africa, and no imperialist baggage—has achieved what these so-called world powers have failed to accomplish. While Western nations have taken sides—arming proxies, issuing hollow statements, and exacerbating tensions—Qatar has approached the crisis with pragmatism, neutrality, and an understanding of the fundamental political issues at play. The recent breakthroughs in peace negotiations between the Congolese government and the M23 rebels, brokered in Doha, have demonstrated that diplomacy does not require overwhelming military power or economic might; it requires sincerity, impartiality, and a commitment to genuine dialogue. This should shame the West, whose engagement in the DR Congo has been anything but constructive. The European Union, for instance, has blindly supported Kinshasa, funneling resources into a government that has repeatedly demonstrated its inability—or unwillingness—to address the root causes of the conflict. Belgium, still tethered to its colonialist instincts, has played an especially unhelpful role, prioritising its geopolitical interests over actual peace. The DR Congo’s former colonial master continues to exert influence behind the scenes, seemingly more concerned with maintaining its economic foothold than fostering a lasting solution. The United Nations, despite its vast resources and decades-long presence in the region, has been reduced to an impotent bystander. Its peacekeeping mission, MONUSCO, has failed spectacularly. Billions of dollars spent, thousands of troops deployed, and yet eastern Congo remains a war zone, its people suffering under the weight of a never-ending crisis. The UNSC’s inability—or unwillingness—to push for an even-handed solution has allowed Kinshasa to play the victim while failing to uphold its own obligations to peace. The hypocrisy of Western engagement in the DR Congo cannot be overstated. The same nations that preach about territorial integrity and sovereignty in Ukraine have been more than willing to support Congolese aggression against the M23, a group that, for all its flaws, has legitimate grievances. The reality is that the DR Congo’s government, backed by its Western sponsors, has prioritised military confrontation over political dialogue. Yet, when a small, non-Western nation like Qatar steps in and manages to broker a deal, the silence from Brussels, London, and Washington is deafening. Why? Because for the West, the conflict in the DR Congo has never been about peace—it has been about influence. The minerals buried beneath Congo’s soil, the strategic alliances, and the power dynamics at play have all dictated their approach. Western capitals have not sought to resolve the conflict but to manage it in ways that serve their interests. Qatar’s intervention has exposed this duplicity. Unlike the EU, the UNSC, or individual Western powers, Doha has no colonial past in Africa, no economic interests that hinge on the conflict’s outcome, and no ideological baggage. It has approached the crisis with a level-headedness that Western nations have been either unwilling or unable to muster. Qatar’s success is not merely a triumph of diplomacy; it is a damning indictment of the global power structure. It proves that resolving conflicts does not require military dominance, economic hegemony, or permanent seats on the UNSC. Rather, it requires sincerity, even-handedness, and the political will to listen to all sides. In contrast, the West’s failure is not due to a lack of resources or expertise—it is due to a lack of genuine commitment to peace. The EU, in particular, has been more interested in virtue-signaling than in effective diplomacy. The UNSC, paralyzed by the competing interests of its permanent members, has shown once again that it is an outdated institution unfit for the challenges of modern conflict resolution. Now that Qatar has managed to secure a framework for peace, the question remains: will the DR Congo’s government honor its commitments? If history is any guide, the answer is uncertain at best. Kinshasa has a track record of making agreements only to renege on them when it suits its political agenda. The government’s portrayal of itself as a helpless victim has been a convenient narrative, one that has won it Western sympathy (and funding) while allowing it to continue waging war under the guise of self-defense. If President Tshisekedi’s administration fails to uphold its side of the bargain, it will no longer be able to blame Rwanda, M23, or external meddling. The world will see, once and for all, that the Congolese government’s cries for sovereignty and territorial integrity are less about peace and more about maintaining power and the economic interests of its ruling elite and their Belgian handlers. Qatar’s diplomatic success in the DR Congo crisis is a case study in how conflict resolution should be approached. It highlights the importance of neutrality, the value of dialogue, and the power of genuine mediation. Doha has shown that even a small nation, devoid of military might or colonial history, can achieve what the world’s so-called superpowers have failed to accomplish. This is a wake-up call. The West’s monopoly on global diplomacy is being eroded, and rightly so. New actors—ones untainted by the failures of the past—are emerging as credible mediators in international conflicts. The message is clear: peace is not about power; it is about will. And if the Western world cannot muster that will, then it is time for others to step in. The DR Congo conflict was never rocket science. It required an honest broker—something the West has never been. Now, thanks to Qatar, the world has a chance to see that diplomacy, not might, is the true path to peace. If Kinshasa fails to seize this opportunity, it will have no one to blame but itself. This time, the world will be watching. The Author is an African Scholar, Analyst, Economic and Political Commentator.

Opinions

Diplomacy, not dominance: Qatar’s breakthrough in the DR Congo