History is not merely a record of past events. It is the living lens through which a nation continues to interpret its journey. For Rwanda, the distance between independence in 1962 and liberation in 1994 is far more than a span of time. It represents a profound political and human journey shaped by hope, division, displacement, and, ultimately, national transformation and reconstruction.

Independence on July 1, 1962, marked the end of colonial rule and the birth of a sovereign state. Yet this new sovereignty did not bring national unity. Instead, the early post-colonial era was marked by deep political instability and state-led discrimination; divisions that had been planted during the late colonial period and were actively carried into the new republics. Decades of targeted violence and political exclusion forced waves of Rwandans into exile, creating a long-standing refugee crisis that successive governments deliberately chose to ignore.

ALSO READ: Habyarimana's role in planning, implementing 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi

These historical fractures formed the backdrop against which the liberation struggle emerged. On October 1, 1990, the Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA) crossed the Ugandan border, launching the Liberation War. Its strategic objective was to compel the Rwandan government, under President Juvénal Habyarimana and Akazu, a powerful informal network of extremist Hutu elites centered around former First Lady Agathe Kanziga who orchestrated the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, to engage in meaningful negotiations over the plight of hundreds of thousands of Rwandan exiles who had been denied their right to return home.

What followed was a complex period defined by intense combat, but also by sustained diplomatic efforts. Throughout 1991, 1992, and 1993, multiple battles demonstrated that the liberation movement remained resilient despite early setbacks. Crucially, the conflict often reignited because the government continued to carry out massacres against its own Tutsi population. The RPA's presence became a vital shield for these targeted communities while simultaneously pressing for a peaceful political resolution.

This combination of military resilience and diplomatic pressure eventually led to the signing of the Arusha Accords in August 1993. The agreement represented genuine hope for a peaceful future built on power-sharing, military integration, and national unity. However, while the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) negotiated in good faith to achieve these political objectives, the Habyarimana regime and Akazu treated the Accords merely as a deceptive stopgap, buying time to prepare for the Genocide against the Tutsi.

During the Genocide against the Tutsi, more than one million people were systematically murdered in just 100 days. The staggering speed of the killings reflected an organized state machinery in which extremist leaders, hate media, and civilian mobilization converged to destroy the nation's social fabric.

ALSO READ: Killing many in a short period; how civilians were prepared for the Genocide

In this dark context, liberation became inseparable from the immediate moral obligation to stop the destruction. The RPA advanced militarily while bearing the immense humanitarian responsibility of rescuing survivors and restoring order. By July 4, 1994, Kigali had been secured, marking a decisive turning point as the genocidal regime was defeated.

As citizens commemorating Kwibohora today, we look back and recognize that liberation was not a final destination but a monumental beginning. Since 1994, Rwanda has achieved what many once thought impossible: reviving and transforming a country from near-total collapse, rebuilding inclusive public institutions and services, and restoring social trust.

Today, the true meaning of liberation is reflected in our commitment to safeguarding historical memory and protecting our hard-won unity.

For the youth, liberation is an active, daily responsibility; to understand our history truthfully, preserve the gains of unity, and contribute with discipline to a future that refuses to be defined by the fractures of the past.

The writer is an international relations and diplomacy enthusiast.